Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Filip vs David Poljak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Filip vs Poljak analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Filip vs David Poljak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Filip 1 - 0 Poljak
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Filip has won 43.43% of points on their second serve, while Poljak has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Filip, in recent form, has won 49.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Poljak has won 50.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.3% and 28.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Filip has saved 53.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poljak has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Filip has won 42.11% of matches played (W/L 8/ 11), with Poljak winning 39.53% (W/L 17/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Filip has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 108).
- Player level: In the last year, Filip has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 7/ 10), where as Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Filip winning 1 times and Poljak being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Filip winning 2 and Poljak winning 0. The last match between Filip and Poljak was at the M15 Cadolzburg, 18-01-2024, Second, Carpet with Jakub Filip getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Filip and Poljak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Filip winning 0 times and Poljak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Filip winning 0, and Poljak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Filip has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.32 while Poljak has played against players with an average rank of 163.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Filip has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poljak has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Filip has converted 55.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poljak has converted 34.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
370
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
44% (12-15)
Career Total W/L
54% (306-258)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Filip | David Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (43/69) | 63% (36/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (32/43) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (10/26) | 48% (10/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (24/57) | 39% (27/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jakub Filip
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Filip | David Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) | 43% (19/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (114/138) | 50% (228/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 38% (5/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 125 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:40 | 1:47:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 90.83 | 159.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (489/862) | 61% (907/1482) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (305/489) | 72% (655/907) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (162/373) | 50% (286/575) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (36/65) | 34% (45/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (302/761) | 37% (536/1451) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (6/6) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 25% (12/3) |
Jakub Filip Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Jakub Filip
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Noah Perfetti
57%
(
69 of
121)
1st Serve %
77%
(
70 of
91)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
56 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruslan Tiukaev
Player
Jakub Filip
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Jakub Filip
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Danial Rakhmatullayev
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
47%
(
14 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Jakub Filip
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Tom Varzandeh
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Waldner
Player
Jakub Filip
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Jakub Filip
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Milan Welte
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
54 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Vs Poljak Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Filip are available here and Poljak photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
